ABSTRACT
International criminal justice system thrives and survives on state cooperation. In order
to end impunity and pursuant to the principles of individual criminal accountability and
individual criminal responsibility, states are obliged to arrest and surrender suspects
within their territories or in their custody or control in terms of Article 86 and 87 of the
Rome statute. State cooperation with the ICC is peremptory, since it is the major
weapon the court can use to bring the suspects to trial since the court does not have
police force or service of its own to arrest and bring suspects before the court. States
parties must co-operate fully with the ICC in its investigations and prosecutions of
crimes within the jurisdiction of the court in terms of Article 86 of the Rome statute. Non
state parties may be invited to provide assistance to the ICC in terms Article 87(5) (a) of
the Rome statute. Article 89(1) provides that the ICC may request arrest and surrender
of a person from any state on the territory of which the suspect may be found and shall
request the cooperation of that state. The aforementioned provisions should be read
mutatis mutandis with the provisions of Article 27 of the Rome statute whose provisions
seek to remove impediments that may hinder the full cooperation of states with on the
pretext of official and personal immunity. Article 27 states that there are no immunities
that may hinder the court from exercising its jurisdiction on any person on the basis of
official and personal immunity. The defense of immunity has grown over the years
especially with African states in particular the recent cases of Uhuru Kenyatta (Kenya)
and Al Bashir (Sudan) where African states requested a deferral from the United
Nations Security Council on the basis that they were seating presidents and could not
be prosecuted. These aforementioned provisions go a long way in promoting
cooperation with the court. It is however, the provisions of Article 98 of the Rome
Statute which seriously impact on state cooperation as it prohibits the court from
compelling a state to surrender any person or property. which may cause state
requested to invoke immunity or protection of the person of the person in terms of its
obligations in terms of its obligations in bi-lateral agreements or International
vii
agreements. This research assesses the impact of Article 98 of the Rome statute to the
state cooperation.
NDLOVU:, A (2021). ANALYSIS OF ARTICLE 98 OF THE ROME STATUTE ON ITS IMPACT IN THE GLOBAL FIGHT AGAINST IMPUNITY.. Afribary. Retrieved from https://afribary.com/works/analysis-of-article-98-of-the-rome-statute-on-its-impact-in-the-global-fight-against-impunity
NDLOVU:, ABEL "ANALYSIS OF ARTICLE 98 OF THE ROME STATUTE ON ITS IMPACT IN THE GLOBAL FIGHT AGAINST IMPUNITY." Afribary. Afribary, 04 May. 2021, https://afribary.com/works/analysis-of-article-98-of-the-rome-statute-on-its-impact-in-the-global-fight-against-impunity. Accessed 23 Nov. 2024.
NDLOVU:, ABEL . "ANALYSIS OF ARTICLE 98 OF THE ROME STATUTE ON ITS IMPACT IN THE GLOBAL FIGHT AGAINST IMPUNITY.". Afribary, Afribary, 04 May. 2021. Web. 23 Nov. 2024. < https://afribary.com/works/analysis-of-article-98-of-the-rome-statute-on-its-impact-in-the-global-fight-against-impunity >.
NDLOVU:, ABEL . "ANALYSIS OF ARTICLE 98 OF THE ROME STATUTE ON ITS IMPACT IN THE GLOBAL FIGHT AGAINST IMPUNITY." Afribary (2021). Accessed November 23, 2024. https://afribary.com/works/analysis-of-article-98-of-the-rome-statute-on-its-impact-in-the-global-fight-against-impunity