Search result: Five clinical trials were found and traced.
Clinical outcomes: The results are conflicting or suggest no difference between conventional GIC and Compomers in regard to their anticariogenic effects after 3-4 years.
[‘Preliminary Systematic Literature Searches’ are based on SYSTEM’s periodic systematic searches of the dental literature and provide first overviews over existing clinical evidence but are limited in the number of databases searched, as well as the assessment of precision and internal validity of results and thus do not replace the need for a full systematic review report to the topic]
Mickenautsch, S. (2019). Cariostatic effect of conventional GIC versus compomers [October 09, 2018]. Afribary. Retrieved from https://afribary.com/works/cariostatic-effect-of-conventional-gic-versus-compomers-october-09-2018
Mickenautsch, Steffen "Cariostatic effect of conventional GIC versus compomers [October 09, 2018]" Afribary. Afribary, 29 May. 2019, https://afribary.com/works/cariostatic-effect-of-conventional-gic-versus-compomers-october-09-2018. Accessed 22 Dec. 2024.
Mickenautsch, Steffen . "Cariostatic effect of conventional GIC versus compomers [October 09, 2018]". Afribary, Afribary, 29 May. 2019. Web. 22 Dec. 2024. < https://afribary.com/works/cariostatic-effect-of-conventional-gic-versus-compomers-october-09-2018 >.
Mickenautsch, Steffen . "Cariostatic effect of conventional GIC versus compomers [October 09, 2018]" Afribary (2019). Accessed December 22, 2024. https://afribary.com/works/cariostatic-effect-of-conventional-gic-versus-compomers-october-09-2018