Cariostatic effect of conventional GIC versus compomers [October 09, 2018]

Steffen Mickenautsch 3 PAGES (876 WORDS) Article
Subscribe to access this work and thousands more

Search result: Five clinical trials were found and traced.

Clinical outcomes: The results are conflicting or suggest no difference between conventional GIC and Compomers in regard to their anticariogenic effects after 3-4 years.

[‘Preliminary Systematic Literature Searches’ are based on SYSTEM’s periodic systematic searches of the dental literature and provide first overviews over existing clinical evidence but are limited in the number of databases searched, as well as the assessment of precision and internal validity of results and thus do not replace the need for a full systematic review report to the topic]

Subscribe to access this work and thousands more
Overall Rating

0

5 Star
(0)
4 Star
(0)
3 Star
(0)
2 Star
(0)
1 Star
(0)
APA

Steffen, M (2019). Cariostatic effect of conventional GIC versus compomers [October 09, 2018]. Afribary.com: Retrieved June 26, 2019, from https://afribary.com/works/cariostatic-effect-of-conventional-gic-versus-compomers-october-09-2018

MLA 8th

Mickenautsch, Steffen. "Cariostatic effect of conventional GIC versus compomers [October 09, 2018]" Afribary.com. Afribary.com, 29 May. 2019, https://afribary.com/works/cariostatic-effect-of-conventional-gic-versus-compomers-october-09-2018 . Accessed 26 Jun. 2019.

MLA7

Mickenautsch, Steffen. "Cariostatic effect of conventional GIC versus compomers [October 09, 2018]". Afribary.com, Afribary.com, 29 May. 2019. Web. 26 Jun. 2019. < https://afribary.com/works/cariostatic-effect-of-conventional-gic-versus-compomers-october-09-2018 >.

Chicago

Mickenautsch, Steffen. "Cariostatic effect of conventional GIC versus compomers [October 09, 2018]" Afribary.com (2019). Accessed June 26, 2019. https://afribary.com/works/cariostatic-effect-of-conventional-gic-versus-compomers-october-09-2018