Evaluation of RepRap 3D Printer Workshops in K-12 STEM

Joshua Pearce 18 PAGES (5361 WORDS) Article
Subscribe to access this work and thousands more

As facilitators of 3D printer workshops, the authors developed a survey to gage how the printers are actually being used and whether they support the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) requirements, especially in regard to engineering design. The survey response rate was 52% of 68 total participants with the majority conveying that 3D printers do facilitate student understanding of the engineering design process and that the workshops empowered them and their students to tackle projects previously perceived as beyond their skill level. Insufficient preparation for troubleshooting hardware and software issues was listed as the greatest barrier to fully realizing the technology’s potential in the classroom. Also highlighted was a lack of resources for development of meaningful lesson plans using this nascent technology.

Subscribe to access this work and thousands more
Overall Rating

0

5 Star
(0)
4 Star
(0)
3 Star
(0)
2 Star
(0)
1 Star
(0)
APA

Joshua, P (2019). Evaluation of RepRap 3D Printer Workshops in K-12 STEM. Afribary.com: Retrieved June 26, 2019, from https://afribary.com/works/evaluation-of-reprap-3d-printer-workshops-in-k-12-stem

MLA 8th

Pearce, Joshua. "Evaluation of RepRap 3D Printer Workshops in K-12 STEM" Afribary.com. Afribary.com, 15 Apr. 2019, https://afribary.com/works/evaluation-of-reprap-3d-printer-workshops-in-k-12-stem . Accessed 26 Jun. 2019.

MLA7

Pearce, Joshua. "Evaluation of RepRap 3D Printer Workshops in K-12 STEM". Afribary.com, Afribary.com, 15 Apr. 2019. Web. 26 Jun. 2019. < https://afribary.com/works/evaluation-of-reprap-3d-printer-workshops-in-k-12-stem >.

Chicago

Pearce, Joshua. "Evaluation of RepRap 3D Printer Workshops in K-12 STEM" Afribary.com (2019). Accessed June 26, 2019. https://afribary.com/works/evaluation-of-reprap-3d-printer-workshops-in-k-12-stem