Longevity of conventional GIC versus compomers in primary teeth [October 14, 2018]
Subscribe to access this work and thousands more
Search result: Four clinical studies concerning restorations
were found.
Clinical outcomes: The results indicate no difference in the success rate between both types of material if high-viscosity GIC was compared against Compomers.
[‘Preliminary Systematic Literature Searches’
are based on SYSTEM’s periodic systematic searches of the dental literature and
provide first overviews over existing clinical evidence but are limited in the
number of databases searched, as well as the assessment of precision and
internal validity of results and thus do not replace the need for a full
systematic review report to the topic]
0
Steffen, M (2019). Longevity of conventional GIC versus compomers in primary teeth [October 14, 2018]. Afribary.com: Retrieved February 29, 2020, from https://afribary.com/works/longevity-of-conventional-gic-versus-compomers-in-primary-teeth-october-14-2018
Mickenautsch, Steffen. "Longevity of conventional GIC versus compomers in primary teeth [October 14, 2018]" Afribary.com. Afribary.com, 24 Jul. 2019, https://afribary.com/works/longevity-of-conventional-gic-versus-compomers-in-primary-teeth-october-14-2018 . Accessed 29 Feb. 2020.
Mickenautsch, Steffen. "Longevity of conventional GIC versus compomers in primary teeth [October 14, 2018]". Afribary.com, Afribary.com, 24 Jul. 2019. Web. 29 Feb. 2020. < https://afribary.com/works/longevity-of-conventional-gic-versus-compomers-in-primary-teeth-october-14-2018 >.
Mickenautsch, Steffen. "Longevity of conventional GIC versus compomers in primary teeth [October 14, 2018]" Afribary.com (2019). Accessed February 29, 2020. https://afribary.com/works/longevity-of-conventional-gic-versus-compomers-in-primary-teeth-october-14-2018