ABSTRACT
This study investigated the relationship between the head teachers’ management dimensions and resource management in secondary schools of Iringa District. It particularly sought to determine the effect of the head teachers’ management dimensions in the areas of Finance, Leadership and Curriculum management as was conceived in their school vision, proactive orientation and conflict resolutions, decisiveness and decision making, management, planning, control and standards, raising work standard and their district image. The study was based on the open system theory which proposes that a school, just like any open organization is informed from different units that must function in unison to produce the desired graduate. Therefore, the head teachers’ management dimensions, exercised in the area of Finance, Leadership and Curriculum management during the study contributed much on the influence of resource management in the secondary schools. The study was conducted through a cross sectional sample survey design, using questionnaires, interviews and focus group discussion. Data was collected between December, 2009 and June of 2010 from 184 respondents from Iringa District. The data was analysed using means, standard deviations, percentage distribution and ANOVA techniques. A sample of 235 Secondary schools teachers were involved, 25 head of schools, 185 teachers and 15 school board members participated in the study by completing a self administered questionnaire. This study was conducted from December, 2009 to June, 2010 through questionnaires, interviews, focus group xii discussion from students, teachers, head teachers, Board members and parents of private and public secondary schools in Iringa District. The findings of the study revealed that there are significant difference in the level of financial management among head teachers in between private and public schools in Iringa District. As the calculated value of F0 = 54.7553 (private) and F0 =255.012 (public) (critical)F~ = 1.92 at 5% level with degree of freedom (13, 56). Also it was proved that there is significant difference in the level of leadership among head teachers in between private and public schools in Iringa District as was proved by ANOVA techniques, F0 = 43.3773 (private) and F~ = 205.6935 (public) at 5% level with degree of freedom (22, 92). Last but not the least the study also revealed that there is significant difference in the level of curriculum management among head teachers in between private and public schools in Iringa District. F0 = 50.8119 (private) and F0 = 217.7546 (public) at 5% level with (57, 232) degree of freedom. From the findings the researcher recommends that design a plan for financial and non — financial rewards to recognize and motivate employees for high productivity levels are highly needed. There should be regular seminars and workshops for teachers and head teachers on desirable leadership behaviors.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Title
Declaration A
Declaration B
Approval iv
Dedication v
Table of contents vii
List of tables x
Abbreviations xi
Abstract xii
CHAPTER ONE: THE PROBLEM AND iTS SCOPE 1
Background of the Study 1
Statement of the Problem 3
Purpose of the Study 3
Research Objectives 3
Research Questions 4
Hypothesis 4
Scope 5
Significance of the Study 5
Operational Definitions of Key Terms 6
CHAPTER TWO: REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE 8
Introduction 8
Theoretical Perspectives 15
Related Studies 19
CHAPTER THREE: METHODOLOGY .20
Research Design 20
Research Population 20
Sample Size 21
Sampling Procedure 21
Research Instrument 21
Validity and Reliability of the Instrument 23
Data Gathering Procedures 25
Data Analysis 25
Ethical Considerations 26
Limitations of the Study 27
CHAPTER FOUR: PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION OF DATA 28
Overview/Introduction 28
Profile of the Respondents 28
Level of management dimensions of the head teachers 31
Significant differences in the level of financial management, leadership
and curriculum management among head teachers between private and
public schools in Iringa District 33
Verification of hypothesis 34
CHAPTER FIVE: FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS 42
Introduction 42
Findings 43
Conclusions 44
Recommendations 45
References .49
Appendices 57
Appendix I - Transmittal Letter 58
Appendix II - Research Instrument 59
Researcher’s Curriculum Vitae 86
Consults, E. & Salum, U (2022). Head Teachers Management Dimensions and Resource Management in the Secondary Schools of Iringa District, Iringa Region, Tanzania. Afribary. Retrieved from https://afribary.com/works/head-teachers-management-dimensions-and-resource-management-in-the-secondary-schools-of-iringa-district-iringa-region-tanzania
Consults, Education, and Ubaya Salum "Head Teachers Management Dimensions and Resource Management in the Secondary Schools of Iringa District, Iringa Region, Tanzania" Afribary. Afribary, 30 Nov. 2022, https://afribary.com/works/head-teachers-management-dimensions-and-resource-management-in-the-secondary-schools-of-iringa-district-iringa-region-tanzania. Accessed 24 Nov. 2024.
Consults, Education, and Ubaya Salum . "Head Teachers Management Dimensions and Resource Management in the Secondary Schools of Iringa District, Iringa Region, Tanzania". Afribary, Afribary, 30 Nov. 2022. Web. 24 Nov. 2024. < https://afribary.com/works/head-teachers-management-dimensions-and-resource-management-in-the-secondary-schools-of-iringa-district-iringa-region-tanzania >.
Consults, Education and Salum, Ubaya . "Head Teachers Management Dimensions and Resource Management in the Secondary Schools of Iringa District, Iringa Region, Tanzania" Afribary (2022). Accessed November 24, 2024. https://afribary.com/works/head-teachers-management-dimensions-and-resource-management-in-the-secondary-schools-of-iringa-district-iringa-region-tanzania