BACKGROUND
OF THE STUDY
In any modern
economy, the efficient production and exchange of goods and services requires
money and bank is the instrument for affecting it. The last few years have been
both traumatic and revolutionary for the banking industry. The industry
produced the largest number of technically insolvent and under capitalized
banks. The magnitude of distress in the nation’s banking industry reached on
unprecedented level making it an issue of concern to the government, the
regulatory authority, the bankers and the general public.
The Nigeria
banking scene was characterized by changes designed to promote banking in the
country. The changes may be categorized into phases, but due to the nature of
work, we will consider tow phase namely; the era of laissez – fair banking
(1834 – 1952), the era of limited was monopolized by foreign banks, principally
the African banking corporation which was the precursor of the (BBWA) British
bank for West African the present First Bank of Nigeria, the Barclays bank DCO
(Dominion Colonial and Overseas) the present day Union Banks, and the British
and French Bank, the for – runner of present United Bank of Africa. Although,
discrimination against Nigerians by these banks led to the establishment of
some indigenous banks which unfortunately offers litter or no competition to
the foreign banks essentially because of their weak capital base or poor
managerial capacity. Consequently, all but three to the indigenous banks
failed. The survived includes the National Bank of Nigeria established in 1933,
the Agbonmagbe Bank (now Wema Bank) established 1945 and the African
Continental Bank 1947.
A commission of
inquiry headed by G.D. patron set up in 1948 to investigate the business of banking
in Nigeria. Their report led to the enactment of the first banking legislation
in Nigeria, the banking ordinance of 1952. The 1952 ordinance laid down the
standard and procedure for the conduct of banking business by prescribing the
mandatory minimum capital requirement for the banks both expatiates and
indigenous regulations to Ʃ100, 000 and Ʃ12,500 respectively and it is also
introduced regulations to check bank failure. However, the entire indigenous
bank established in the country during this period also all failed. The bank
failures of this era were attributed largely to the monopolistic structure of
the banking industry, which allowed the foreign banks to enjoy exclusive
patronage form British firms. The indigenous banks that survived were able to
make it because of the support they got from their state government.
The distress
phenomenon in Nigeria banking industry is of recent origin. The manifestation
became discernable with some policy shocks staring 1988 with Central bank of
Nigeria (CBN) directive to banks that naira backing for foreign exchange
application be lodged with CBN. This was followed in 1989 by another directive
requiring public sector deposits to be transferred to CBN. These two directives
exposed the precious liquidity position of some banks and the distress they
have subterraneous harbored. What was thought to be a temporary liquidity
problem for few banks soon catches up with a lot more banks.
It is important to
stress in this work that banking system was already in distress by the time
NDIC was established. By them, 7 (seven) banks were known to be technically
insolvent. The government at that time, did not embark upon a clearing exercise
that would have removed from the system that distressed institutions because it
was feared that such an action would lead to loss of public confidence and
flight of foreign capital more so there was no deposit insurance institution to
expeditiously manage such bank closures. The NDIC was nevertheless required to
insure all banks. That means that the corporation has been involved in managing
distressed banks even before it could settle down and minister enough resources
for this important task.
The intermediating
role of banks and their relevance both in the transmission of monetary policies
and in the payment system underscore their importance as well as the problem
that bank distress at the prevailing dimension in our economy could
precipitate. Arising from their intermediation, banks generate financial
resources and put these at the disposal of deficit economic growth in the form
of increased output. Therefore, an industry wide insolvency of banks, such as
the one experienced in Nigeria, should be expected to retard the economy’s rate
of capital formation, reduce its level of employment and output and ultimately
the pace of economic growth.
Anonymous, U (2020). The Impact of Bank Distress on Commercial Banks. Afribary.com: Retrieved January 25, 2021, from https://afribary.com/works/the-impact-of-bank-distress-on-commercial-banks
User, Anonymous. "The Impact of Bank Distress on Commercial Banks" Afribary.com. Afribary.com, 10 Sep. 2020, https://afribary.com/works/the-impact-of-bank-distress-on-commercial-banks . Accessed 25 Jan. 2021.
User, Anonymous. "The Impact of Bank Distress on Commercial Banks". Afribary.com, Afribary.com, 10 Sep. 2020. Web. 25 Jan. 2021. < https://afribary.com/works/the-impact-of-bank-distress-on-commercial-banks >.
User, Anonymous. "The Impact of Bank Distress on Commercial Banks" Afribary.com (2020). Accessed January 25, 2021. https://afribary.com/works/the-impact-of-bank-distress-on-commercial-banks