A Comparison Between Molecular And Serological Methods In The Detection Of Bovine Brucella Species

SSA Research ZANELE NKOMO 54 PAGES (10923 WORDS) Dissertation
Subscribe to access this work and thousands more

ABSTRACT

Bovine brucellosis is endemic in Zimbabwe and is an important veterinary disease, responsible for large losses in livestock through abortions and still-born calves. It is also a zoonotic disease and as such poses a threat to public health. For this reason, it is important for every farmer to know the status of their herd. This study was carried out to compare the reliability of serological tests with molecular test in the detection of bovine brucellosis. A total of 17 whole blood and serum samples were collected from a herd of cattle in Matabeleland that had previously been vaccinated. This study was conducted in July 2015. The serum samples were tested for brucellosis serologically using the Complement Fixation test (CFT). DNA was extracted from the whole blood samples and the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) was used to test for Brucella using Brucella specific primers. Test results from serological and molecular methods were then compared. Serological tests showed that all samples were positive for brucellosis using CFT. Using molecular methods, only 12 samples were found positive while 5 samples were negative for the Brucella bacteria. In this study, it was possible to differentiate the species as well as the biovars of Brucella using PCR which was not possible using serological techniques. Samples that were positive for Brucella were either B. abortus biovars (1, 2, 4) which produced a 100 bp and 498 bp bands or B. abortus biovars (3, 5, 6, 9) / B. suis (2, 3, 4, 5) which produced a 100 bp band. Further differentiation between B. abortus (3, 5, 6, 9) and B. suis (2, 3, 4, 5) could not be done due to a limitation in laboratory resources. The study confirms PCR to be a more reliable and specific tool for the detection of Brucella spp. when compared to the conventional CFT method of detecting brucellosis used in Zimbabwe. The use/adoption of PCR as a confirmatory test in the testing of Brucellosis is recommended in this study.

Subscribe to access this work and thousands more
Overall Rating

0

5 Star
(0)
4 Star
(0)
3 Star
(0)
2 Star
(0)
1 Star
(0)
APA

SSA, R (2021). A Comparison Between Molecular And Serological Methods In The Detection Of Bovine Brucella Species. Afribary.com: Retrieved May 08, 2021, from https://afribary.com/works/a-comparison-between-molecular-and-serological-methods-in-the-detection-of-bovine-brucella-species

MLA 8th

Research, SSA. "A Comparison Between Molecular And Serological Methods In The Detection Of Bovine Brucella Species" Afribary.com. Afribary.com, 04 May. 2021, https://afribary.com/works/a-comparison-between-molecular-and-serological-methods-in-the-detection-of-bovine-brucella-species . Accessed 08 May. 2021.

MLA7

Research, SSA. "A Comparison Between Molecular And Serological Methods In The Detection Of Bovine Brucella Species". Afribary.com, Afribary.com, 04 May. 2021. Web. 08 May. 2021. < https://afribary.com/works/a-comparison-between-molecular-and-serological-methods-in-the-detection-of-bovine-brucella-species >.

Chicago

Research, SSA. "A Comparison Between Molecular And Serological Methods In The Detection Of Bovine Brucella Species" Afribary.com (2021). Accessed May 08, 2021. https://afribary.com/works/a-comparison-between-molecular-and-serological-methods-in-the-detection-of-bovine-brucella-species