ABSTRACT The study evaluates the judiciary as the major unit of criminal justice system in Nigeria. Case flow management, financial autonomy, inadequate facilities, and other constraints have made it difficult for judiciary in Enugu State to dispense cases freely. The objectives of this study therefore were to find out how slow dispensation of cases by judiciary affects their citizens in criminal matters. The researcher used propositions to discuss and analyze the problems facing judiciary in Enugu State. The Nigeria judicial system is besieged by both institutional and legal constraints, it is obvious that changes are inevitable and that criminal justice system should move and adapt to changes in society. Considering the recommendation of this study, judges are advised to enhance effective dispensation of justice and restore confidence of the public in the court system.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Title page - - - - - - - - - - i
Approval page - - - - - - - - - - ii
Dedication - - - - - - - - - - iii
Acknowledgement - - - - - - - - - iv
Table of Contents - - - - - - - - - v
Acronyms - - - - - - - - - - vi
Abstract - - - - - - - - - - viii
CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background to the Study - - - - - - - - 1
1.2 Study Area - - - - - - - - - 2
1.3 Focus of the Study - - - - - - - - 3
1.4 Statement of the Problem - - - - - - - - 3
1.5 Research Questions - - - - - - - - 5
1.6 Objectives of the Study - - - - - - - - 5
1.7 Significance of the Study - - - - - - - - 6
1.8 Definition of Concepts - - - - - - - - 6
CHAPTER TWO: LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 Review of Empirical Literature - - - - - - - 7
2.2 Review of Theoretical Literature - - - - - - - 9
2.3 Review of Theories - - - - - - - - 22
2.4 Theoretical Framework - - - - - - - - 23
2.5 Research Propositions - - - - - - - - - 24
vi
CHAPTER THREE: DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Preposition I: Factors that are responsible for slow dispensation of justice in Enugu State 25
Proposition II: A judiciary that has financial autonomy is more likely to function better
than a judiciary that lack financial autonomy - - - - - - 31
Propositions III: Judicial Staff who have good conditions of service are most likely to
performs better than those with poor conditions- - - - - - 33
CHAPTER FOUR: SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION
Summary - - - - - - - - - - 36
Conclusion - - - - - - - - - - 37
Recommendations - - - - - - - - - 37
References - - - - - - - - - - 39
Judith, U (2022). An Evaluation of the Judiciary as a Major Plank of Criminal Justice System in Nigeria: A Study of Enugu State. Afribary. Retrieved from https://afribary.com/works/an-evaluation-of-the-judiciary-as-a-major-plank-of-criminal-justice-system-in-nigeria-a-study-of-enugu-state
Judith, Ugwuanyi "An Evaluation of the Judiciary as a Major Plank of Criminal Justice System in Nigeria: A Study of Enugu State" Afribary. Afribary, 19 Oct. 2022, https://afribary.com/works/an-evaluation-of-the-judiciary-as-a-major-plank-of-criminal-justice-system-in-nigeria-a-study-of-enugu-state. Accessed 22 Nov. 2024.
Judith, Ugwuanyi . "An Evaluation of the Judiciary as a Major Plank of Criminal Justice System in Nigeria: A Study of Enugu State". Afribary, Afribary, 19 Oct. 2022. Web. 22 Nov. 2024. < https://afribary.com/works/an-evaluation-of-the-judiciary-as-a-major-plank-of-criminal-justice-system-in-nigeria-a-study-of-enugu-state >.
Judith, Ugwuanyi . "An Evaluation of the Judiciary as a Major Plank of Criminal Justice System in Nigeria: A Study of Enugu State" Afribary (2022). Accessed November 22, 2024. https://afribary.com/works/an-evaluation-of-the-judiciary-as-a-major-plank-of-criminal-justice-system-in-nigeria-a-study-of-enugu-state