Assessment Of Water Availability And Accessibility For Healthy And Sustainable Livelihoods In Sankuri And Central Divisions, Garissa County, Kenya

MARUTI EDWIN 119 PAGES (26356 WORDS) Hydrogeology Thesis
Subscribe to access this work and thousands more

ABSTRACT

Availability and accessibility of safe water is key to sustainable livelihoods in the world hence,

poverty eradication and good health leading to agricultural and economic prosperity. Poor water

availability and accessibility is a pressing problem in developing countries in Africa, therefore,

understanding of water as a natural resource and human consumption commodity can help solve the

problem and contribute to achievement of Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). Kenya is a water

scarce nation with per capita water of 650m3 below the recommended 1000m3. Water accessibility in

Garissa County is a major concern, the Governments and NGOs have directed their resources and

efforts to avail water to the people, but still poor water availability and accessibility persists. This

study was conducted in Sankuri and Central divisions of Garissa County, Kenya. The general

objective of the study was to assess availability and accessibility of water for sustainable livelihood

in the study area. The study employed a descriptive research design and used clustered sampling to

select the divisions due to its cost effectiveness; the sampling unit were administrative locations which

were randomly sampled. The sample frame was households which were stratified and systematically

sampled. A sample of 300 household heads were selected and data collection was done by use of

interviews, questionnaires, observation and FGDs. Water quality testing and bacteriological analysis

were carried out to assess the quality of water as per the standards by World Health

Organizations(WHO)(2013). Data analysis was both quantitative and qualitative. Data from

questionnaire was analysed quantitatively using SPSS, and results presented using frequency

distribution tables and percentages, averages, charts and graphs; while data from FGDs and interviews

was qualitatively analysed using grouping and ranking, and results presented thematically in a

narrative form. Water quality was analysed at the WRMA Laboratory. According to the results, 63%

of respondents were male and 37% were female attributed to cultural setup. First, the study found that

the main water sources are the river, (55.6%) boreholes(45.3%) and Piped water (69.5%).The study

indicates that distance, time taken between water sources and households and water quality have a

direct influence on water sources availability and accessibility as (69%) of respondents cannot access

water sources, majority (71%) travel long distances (1-6 km), (36.3%) take 4-6 hours fetching water,

this is against WHO limits of 1km, the daily water per capita consumption was 6.6 litres below WHO

limits of 25 litres, the study found out that distance affect household water sources accessibility (c2 =

25.53; df =2; p =0.000). Some water sources in Sankuri division have high arsenic levels (16μg/l),

pH (8.78) and conductivity (22000μs/cm), exceeding the limit of 10μg/l for arsenic, 6.0 - 8.0 for pH

and 2,500μs/cm for conductivity by WHO (2013), therefore the study found that water quantity and

quality have a direct impact on livelihoods (c2 = 37.783; df = 2; p =0.000). Thirdly, bacteriological

analysis indicated the presence E.coli in water sources exceeding the limit of 0/100ML by WHO

(2013), causing water borne diseases. Hence, the result indicated that accessibility of quality water

has a direct influence on health (c2 = 32.783; df = 2; p =0.000). Hence, the stated hypotheses were

rejected. The study concluded that accessibility to water sources is affected by distance and water

quality from households; sustainable livelihoods depends on water quantity and quality with

implications on health, environment and livelihoods; and water sources are contaminated due to the

presence of high levels of E.coli. The study recommended that the National and County governments,

development partners and NGOs should invest in other alternative sources of water, establish polices

and mechanisms for water supply and distribution to improve livelihoods, and conduct campaigns

and awareness to educate the community on good hygiene practices such as constructing and using

latrines for faecal disposal to reduce water borne diseases.

Subscribe to access this work and thousands more