INTRODUCTION
Change in our imagination is always difficult, especially when we are no longer young.1 The same change was demanded by Copernicus, who met the view which posits that the world was stationary. Until now his view are still been debated among historians, philosophers and a host of scholars. This view of change from the above analysis shows that the concept of statics is older. It equally holds that if observed, observer would notice that it is characterized by difficulties. This difficulties could be seen in how hard it was to initiate a twist, thus it supports the old adage that states old habit dies hard. The aim of this paper is to look at history, its pattern and growth of the discipline up to the 20th century. In the study of history a lot of difficulties would emerge and these difficulties form our problem. There are numerous sources, these sources are supplied by those who could be considered today to have little or no education, and hence it makes it difficult to work on. The following questions are raised tohelp the research : What direction is history moving along ? How can stakeholders understand its motion? What is the nature of history and how is it been looked upon by scholars of different times?
Ebbah, E. (2020). Mutation of Historical Character and Object. Afribary. Retrieved from https://afribary.com/works/mutation-of-historical-character-and-object
Ebbah, Emudiaga "Mutation of Historical Character and Object" Afribary. Afribary, 04 Aug. 2020, https://afribary.com/works/mutation-of-historical-character-and-object. Accessed 22 Dec. 2024.
Ebbah, Emudiaga . "Mutation of Historical Character and Object". Afribary, Afribary, 04 Aug. 2020. Web. 22 Dec. 2024. < https://afribary.com/works/mutation-of-historical-character-and-object >.
Ebbah, Emudiaga . "Mutation of Historical Character and Object" Afribary (2020). Accessed December 22, 2024. https://afribary.com/works/mutation-of-historical-character-and-object